PSJD News Digest – February 27, 2026

Sam Halpert, NALP Director of Public Service Initiatives

Photo: Harris and Ewing Collection, Library of Congress

Hi Interested Public,

Welcome to the week’s end. Several major stories laid out for you below as editor’s choices. In other news, an appeals court has allowed President Trump’s anti-union effort within the civil service to proceed, while another court considers his plan to liquidate the CFPB. At a meeting of AILA in Oklahoma, attorneys shared that ICE is courting their labor with generous compensation packages, while Democrats in several states are proposing rules that would restrict ICE employees’ future ability to work in civil service at the state level. A possible strike is brewing among court clerks in San Francisco that could affect judicial operations there, while defense counsel in Massachusetts warn that prosecutors’ efforts to re-introduce cases previously dropped during that state’s work stoppage could re-ignite their crisis. As always, these stories and more are in the links below. Solidarity,

Sam

Editor’s Choice(s)

  • Inside the upheaval at the Minnesota U.S. Attorney’s Office (Minnesota Star Tribune; 27 Feb 2026)

    “For the first time since President Donald Trump took office in 2025, legal experts said, one of his Justice Department lawyers was found in contempt of court. And the chief judge has threatened even harsher sanctions. It’s an extraordinary moment during a crisis that has engulfed the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Minnesota, one that exposed how an exodus of legal talent has left the office in tatters, unable to comply with even its most basic responsibilities.”

  • Some Student Loan Borrowers May Soon Receive Refunds Worth Thousands (Forbes; 24 Feb 2026)

    “The reason for the refunds is related to student loan forgiveness. Thousands of borrowers who recently were notified that they qualify for a discharge under income-driven repayment, or IDR, plans may be reimbursed for excess payments they made after they reached their eligibility threshold for a discharge. And because many of these borrowers may have continued making monthly payments on their student loans long after becoming eligible for a discharge (without even realizing it), a sizable portion of these borrowers may be due for big refund checks.”

Federal Restructuring & Funding

Non-Federal Funding & Restructuring

Civil Society

Student Debt & Other Student Concerns

Conflicts Over Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility

Access to Justice

Comments off

PSJD News Digest – February 24, 2026

Sam Halpert, NALP Director of Public Service Initiatives

Photo: Harris and Ewing Collection, Library of Congress

Hi Interested Public,

It’ll be a two-digest week as I catch up from last week. A few eye-catching stories are in “Editor’s choices,” below. In other news, the federal executive is terminating union contracts, multiple states are struggling with shortages of prosecutors and public defenders, and the ABA is weighing the repeal of its diversity standard. As always, these stories and more are in the links below. Solidarity,

Sam

Editor’s Choice(s)

Federal Restructuring & Funding

Non-Federal Funding & Restructuring

Civil Society

Student Debt & Other Student Concerns

  • Student-loan borrowers in public service are in a growing debt relief bind (Business Insider; 18 Feb 2026)

    “A recent court update from the Department of Education reported an increase in the backlog of buyback processing. The filing said that 83,370 applications were pending as of December 31. Over the month of December, the department approved 1,690 buyback applications and received an additional 5,090.”

Conflicts Over Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility

Access to Justice

Comments off

PSJD News Digest – February 13, 2026

Sam Halpert, NALP Director of Public Service Initiatives

Photo: Harris and Ewing Collection, Library of Congress

Hi Interested Public,

Cold days continue. Lots of interesting news in the links below. Solidarity,

Sam

Editor’s Choice(s)

Federal Restructuring & Funding

Non-Federal Funding & Restructuring

Civil Society

Student Debt & Other Student Concerns

Conflicts Over Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility

Access to Justice

Comments off

PSJD News Digest – January 23, 2026

Sam Halpert, NALP Director of Public Service Initiatives

Photo: Harris and Ewing Collection, Library of Congress

Hi Interested Public,

Lots to cover this week as many of us batten down for the incoming storm. Students begin to respond to national headlines about federal immigration activity in Minnesota and elsewhere. The federal government continues its layoff drive at various agencies, while the new year gives some an opportunity to assess the effects of these efforts to-date. The Department of Education delayed its plans to garnish student debtors’ wages, and various communities look at new avenues for legal aid related to various immigration concerns. As always, these stories and more are in the links below. Solidarity,

Sam

Editor’s Choice(s)

  • Six US Prosecutors Resign in Minnesota as Crackdown Builds (Bloomberg Law; 13 Jan 2026)

    “Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz (D) condemned the development as ‘the latest sign that President Trump is pushing nonpartisan career professionals out of the Department of Justice and replacing them with his sycophants.’ Walz’s statement referred to resignations of ‘at least six prosecutors.’”

  • Prosecutors Subpoena Minnesota Democrats as Part of Federal Inquiry (New York Times; 20 Jan 2026)

    While the subpoenas did not cite a specific criminal statute, the inquiry as a whole was said to center on whether elected officials in Minnesota had conspired to impede the thousands of federal agents who have been in the state since last month looking for undocumented immigrants. But the investigation is likely to run up against stiff pushback for examining political speech and conduct that is traditionally protected by the First Amendment.” [emphasis added]

  • Klobuchar, Smith Call on ICE to Allow Access to Legal Counsel (Sen. Klobuchar PR; 22 Jan 2026)

    “U.S. Senators Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) and Tina Smith (D-MN) are calling on the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to follow federal law and the Constitution by allowing people in detention to have access to legal counsel. Reports indicate that some of those detained, including at least one U.S. citizen, are being denied their constitutional right to access an attorney.”

Federal Restructuring & Funding

Non-Federal Funding & Restructuring

Civil Society

Student Debt & Other Student Concerns

Conflicts Over Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility

Access to Justice

Comments off

PSJD News Digest – January 9, 2026

Sam Halpert, NALP Director of Public Service Initiatives

Photo: Harris and Ewing Collection, Library of Congress

Hi Interested Public,

Welcome to a new year–and a return to our regular schedule.. Lots has happened since the last issue, including a number of major news stories regarding student loans. Also, a case in the 1st Circuit could upend IOLTA funds, the Vice President has announced a new attorney position that would report directly to the White House (not the DOJ, which recently fired its chief ethics official)…the list goes on. As always, these stories and more are in the links below. Solidarity,

Sam

Editor’s Choice(s)

  • First Circuit questions legal aid funding across entire US (Courthouse News; 5 Jan 2026)

    “In 1993, the First Circuit upheld an IOLTA program against a similar First Amendment challenge. That case relied on a 1977 Supreme Court decision that allowed public-sector unions to force employees to pay union dues even if they didn’t support the union. In 2018, however, the Supreme Court overruled its 1977 decision in a case known as Janus. So Wescott claims the First Circuit’s 1993 decision is no longer good law and should be discarded as well.

    U.S. Circuit Judge Julie Rikelman agreed that the 1993 case “held that the interest belonged to no one. It wasn’t the client’s money. And that doesn’t hold up after Janus.” But the unspoken backdrop to the new case is that a ruling for the plaintiff could upend bar and legal aid programs across the country, which have relied on IOLTA funding since changes to federal banking law allowed the first such program in Florida in 1981.”

Federal Restructuring & Funding

Non-Federal Funding & Restructuring

Civil Society

Student Debt & Other Student Concerns

Conflicts Over Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility

Access to Justice

Comments off

PSJD News Digest – December 12, 2025

Sam Halpert, NALP Director of Public Service Initiatives

Photo: Harris and Ewing Collection, Library of Congress

Hi Interested Public,

Welcome to the end of another week. Lots to wrap up in the stories below, from news over the first weeks of December. I’ll cover the second half of the month Friday after next, and be back on a regular schedule in the new year.

Solidarity,

Sam

Editor’s Choice(s)

  • DOJ says lower court ruling would ‘wreak havoc’ on the civil service absent Supreme Court intervention (Government Executive; 5 Dec 2025)

    “The Trump administration on Friday requested the Supreme Court block a review of whether the president has rendered key civil service laws as no longer functional, arguing a lower panel of judges that required the inquiry had overstepped its authority. The looming review followed a lawsuit from immigration judges within the Justice Department, but the administration’s top lawyer said they must take their case to a separate, executive branch appeals panel rather than federal court. Any steps Trump may have taken to undermine that pathway, he argued, is not material to the case. Chief Justice John Roberts acted quickly on Friday to pause an appeals court ruling that would have required the fact-finding inquiry into the impacts of Trump’s changes to civil service policies.”

Federal Restructuring

Federal Shutdown

Civil Society

Student Debt & Other Student Concerns

  • Millions of borrowers in Biden's SAVE plan would start paying under new settlement (NPR; 9 Dec 2025)

    “[The proposed] agreement, pending court approval, would end the long legal battle over SAVE by ending SAVE itself. The Education Department would commit not to enroll more borrowers in SAVE, to deny all pending SAVE applications and to move the roughly 7 million borrowers still enrolled in SAVE into other repayment plans – though some of those plans are also in flux.”

Conflicts Over Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility

Access to Justice

Comments off

PSJD News Digest – November 14, 2025

Sam Halpert, NALP Director of Public Service Initiatives

Photo: Harris and Ewing Collection, Library of Congress

Hi Interested Public,

Welcome to the end of another week–and the end of the United States’ longest shutdown of the federal government. Welcome back, to all the federal workers who returned to work yesterday. The “Federal Shutdown” section below includes a number of stories picking apart what reporting indicates we can expect next. The “Editor’s Choices” section includes a number of additional, noteworthy stories. Additional stories, as always, are in the links below.

Solidarity,

Sam

Editor’s Choice(s)

  • Justice Department struggles as thousands exit — and few are replaced (Washington Post; 10 Nov 2024)

    “The Justice Department has lost thousands of experienced attorneys since the start of the Trump administration and has backfilled a fraction of the open jobs, with the process snarled by a lack of qualified candidates, bureaucratic delays and hiring freezes, according to people familiar with hirings in the department. …Employment law experts said they worry that some Trump officials are finding work-arounds in the hiring process to ensure that new hires for nonpolitical career positions align with the president’s politics. When prospective Justice Department employees apply for a job, for example, they are asked to detail a Trump executive order or policy that is significant to them and how they would advance that initiative. The question is also asked of people applying to other executive branch agencies.”

  • Why I Am Resigning, by Mark L. Wolf [D. Mass.] (The Atlantic; 9 Nov 2025)

    “In 1985, President Ronald Reagan appointed me as a federal judge. I was 38 years old. At the time, I looked forward to serving for the rest of my life. However, I resigned Friday…My reason is simple: I no longer can bear to be restrained by what judges can say publicly or do outside the courtroom. President Donald Trump is using the law for partisan purposes, targeting his adversaries while sparing his friends and donors from investigation, prosecution, and possible punishment. This is contrary to everything that I have stood for in my more than 50 years in the Department of Justice and on the bench. The White House’s assault on the rule of law is so deeply disturbing to me that I feel compelled to speak out. Silence, for me, is now intolerable.”

  • Maurene Comey’s Case Is More Consequential Than Her Father’s [opinion] (New York Times; 13 Nov 2025)

    “The resolution of Ms. Comey’s challenge to her dismissal could affect the legal rights of nearly all federal employees…According to the latest version of the law, passed in 1978, employees are entitled to “fair and equitable treatment … without regard to political affiliation … and with proper regard for their privacy and constitutional rights,” and personnel actions (including firings) must be based on merit and fitness, and must not be arbitrary, capricious or discriminatory. According to her legal claim, Ms. Comey was fired in violation of these provisions. Her lawsuit is a nearly perfect test case, because she had an impeccable record as a prosecutor.”

    • Justice Dept. Struggled to Find Lawyers to Handle Maurene Comey Suit (New York Times; 13 Nov 2025)

      “Two months later, the Justice Department, hobbled by scores of resignations and firings and strained by a crisis in morale, has not responded to the lawsuit. The department, according to three people with knowledge of the matter, has struggled to determine which of its offices and lawyers will handle Ms. Comey’s lawsuit, leading to the highly unusual lapse. The people spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss internal Justice Department affairs.”

Federal Restructuring

  • The DOJ has been firing judges with immigrant defense backgrounds (NPR; 6 Nov 2025)

    “Nemer was one of the first immigration judges fired by the Trump administration after a slew of dismissals of leaders at the Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR), the branch of the Justice Department that houses immigration courts. Later that month, the administration fired 12 judges — an entire incoming class that had just been trained and was about to take the bench…The pattern has been consistent. Every few months this year, a new class of judges gets termination notices in the middle of the day, often while they are in the middle of immigration court proceedings. The notices often target those who have reached the end of their two-year probationary period, a trial period for federal workers before they are "converted" to permanent employees. It was previously common for these civil servants to be converted to permanent employees of the DOJ. …She wonders if her past experience representing immigrants got her fired, even though she also worked at DHS as an asylum officer. Her hunch has some correlation with the data.”

  • Trump administration declares CFPB funding illegal (Politico; 11 Nov 2025)

    “The Trump administration has formally determined the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s current funding mechanism is unlawful, a move that puts the agency on track to close in the coming months when its existing cash runs out. The decision, disclosed in a court filing late Monday, marks the administration’s most direct effort yet to dismantle the consumer watchdog and sets up a new front in the ongoing legal battle over its future. The administration said it now considers the CFPB legally barred from seeking additional money from the Federal Reserve, which is the agency’s typical source of funding.”

Federal Shutdown

  • Senate moves shutdown-ending deal that would ensure backpay and unwind some federal layoffs (Government Executive; 9 Nov 2025)

    “In one concession to Democrats, the bill will unwind the more than 4,000 layoffs the Trump administration issued during the shutdown. Those reductions in force are currently paused by a federal court…The legislation would ban all agencies from carrying out any RIFs through January. The package of three full-year funding bills would largely reject funding cuts proposed by President Trump, particularly those within USDA.”

  • End of government shutdown won’t stop SNAP mayhem (WBJF; 13 Nov 2025)

    “[S]tates that have issued partial benefits this month may run into more complications when the shutdown ends, as they will have to recalculate the remaining benefits for their beneficiaries. For some states, this could mean hiring third-party vendors to handle this administrative task, as many don’t have the necessary infrastructure to process the unprecedented disruption. States that managed to maintain full benefits so far have run into roadblocks of their own…Green noted this disruption has crucial implications. Because of provisions in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, states will have to begin paying for part of SNAP benefits beginning in 2028, with this percentage determined by payment error rates. Error rates hovered around 11 percent nationally in 2024.”

  • Federal workers question whether the longest government shutdown was worth their sacrifice (AP; 14 Nov 2025)

    “With the longest shutdown ever over, Sweet and hundreds of thousands of other federal workers who missed paychecks will soon get some relief. But many are left feeling that their livelihoods served as political pawns in the fight between recalcitrant lawmakers in Washington and are asking themselves whether the battle was worth their sacrifices…But the whiplash of the past six weeks, coupled with the concern that the longest shutdown ever may not be the last they face, has shaken many in the workforce…For Sweet, the feelings of frustration are only compounded by a feeling that she was betrayed by the Democratic-aligned senators who broke with the party on the health care subsidies…“There are other federal workers who understood what we were holding the line for and are extremely unhappy that line was crossed and that trust was breached,” she said. The federal workers who spoke to The Associated Press had one common message: that they were reeling but ready to get back to work.”

Non-Federal Governmental Issues

Civil Society

Student Debt & Other Student Concerns

  • Warren, Senators Urge Trump Administration to Stop Imminent “Tax Bomb” for Student Loan Borrowers (Protect Borrowers; 10 Nov 2025)

    “In 2021, Congress passed into law a provision excluding student debt cancellation from taxable income. As a result, borrowers who received student debt relief after years of repayment were not faced with high and unexpected tax bills. However, that provision is set to expire at the end of this year. Absent action from President Trump or Republicans in Congress, this expiration will mean that borrowers on IDR plans who have legally earned debt cancellation after 20 or 25 years of repayment will be hit with significant tax bills.”

Conflicts Over Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility

Access to Justice

Comments off

PSJD News Digest (Last Week of October, First Week of November)

Hi Interested Public,

Okay. We’ve got some catching up to do. This digest covers the last week of October and the first week of November. I’ll be releasing another one tomorrow at the regular time to cover this week. The news below primarily concerns the new final rule from the Department of Education giving them the authority to disqualify PSLF payments from borrowers employed with public service organizations with a “substantial illegal purpose” (read all about that in Student Loans, below). In tomorrow’s digest, I’ll look at news from this week–including stories analyzing the Continuing Resolution ending the federal shutdown, which included a number of provisions related to federal employee compensation and reductions in force. (So, you won’t find that story below; check in again tomorrow.)

Solidarity,

Sam

Editor’s Choice(s)

Federal Restructuring

  • Hegseth fired the Air Force’s top lawyer. The JAG who took on the job is stepping away. (Government Executive; 24 Oct 2025)“It’s been eight months since the service had a Senate-confirmed leader in the role.”
  • Federal Whistleblowers Sound an Alarm Over Civil Rights at HUD (The Nation; 31 Oct 2025)“[F]our attorneys and staff workers at the Department of Housing and Urban Development, or HUD’s Office of General Counsel and Office of Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity, went public with an emergency complaint…Civil rights enforcement at HUD and throughout the federal government is being dismantled…When you come to us with a complaint, it might not even get investigated because of the staffing cuts or because political appointees say that, “We don’t want to look into that type of case anymore. That’s DEI now. We’re just not going to do that.”
  • DOE beefs up legal staffing (Politico; 27 Oct 2025)
  • Interior misuses ‘acting’ titles, nonprofit watchdog says (E&E News [Politico]; 31 Oct 2025)“The Interior Department failed to follow federal law by letting senior officials who lack Senate confirmation serve in “acting” roles, according to a nonprofit watchdog group. Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER) is planning to send a letter Friday to Interior Secretary Doug Burgum, accusing four senior Trump administration officials of serving with improper titles.”

Federal Shutdown

Non-Federal Governmental Issues

Civil Society

Student Debt & Other Student Concerns

Conflicts Over Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility

Access to Justice

Comments off

PSJD News Digest – October 24, 2025

Sam Halpert, NALP Director of Public Service Initiatives

Photo: Harris and Ewing Collection, Library of Congress

Hi Interested Public,

Welcome to the end of another week. I’ve highlighted five big stories across a range of issues that have consumed much of this newsletter’s attention over the past 10 months. Still, lots of big stories lurking in the lower headings as well.

Solidarity,

Sam

Editor’s Choice(s)

Federal Restructuring

  • The Caribbean Strikes and the Collapse of Legal Oversight in U.S. Military Operations (Just Security; 23 Oct 2025)

    “A striking number of former government attorneys who have served both Republican and Democratic administrations agree that a red line has been crossed and that the garbled legal justifications provided by the administration are inconsistent with the facts and the law. Based on reporting by the Wall Street Journal and CNN, there are lawyers currently serving inside DoD who also agree and have tried to push back. …the current administration’s approach has been to centralize legal authority, discourage dissent, and marginalize career legal professionals—including military attorneys with deep operational law expertise. Reports suggest that Combatant Command and Pentagon lawyers were excluded from meaningful review of the Caribbean strikes, which, if true, would be a troubling departure from long-established practice. This sidelining reflects a broader pattern that predates the Trump Administration but has only accelerated: a “post hoc” approach to national security lawyering—where legal reasoning is developed after operational decisions are made, often without the benefit of full interagency legal review.”

Federal Shutdown

Non-Federal Governmental Issues

  • NC House committee probes legal aid spending, as organizations face funding cuts and uncertainty (BPR; 22 Oct 2025)

    “North Carolina House lawmakers held a hearing Wednesday to question how millions of dollars in legal aid grants are distributed through a state program. The House Select Committee on Oversight and Reform questioned the Interest on Lawyers’ Trust Accounts. Under that program, the interest from certain accounts held in escrow is distributed to nonprofits that provide legal services for people who can't afford them. The General Assembly froze the program's grantmaking in July while lawmakers investigated how funds are given. Rep. Allison Dahle warned that the freeze could jeopardize hundreds of jobs at Legal Aid of North Carolina, the state's largest nonprofit law firm.”

Civil Society

Student Debt & Other Student Concerns

Conflicts Over Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility

  • Columbia University Group Sues U.S. Government Over Trump Administration’s Law Firm Pledge Records (JD Journal; 23 Oct 2025)

    “The Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University, a nonprofit dedicated to defending freedom of speech, press, and government transparency, brought the suit after the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and the Department of Justice (DOJ) allegedly failed to respond adequately to formal Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests. These requests sought the release of correspondence, memoranda, and agreements connected to pledges that several elite law firms reportedly made earlier this year to provide nearly $940 million in pro bono legal services to the Trump White House.”

Access to Justice

Comments off

PSJD News Digest – October 17, 2025

Sam Halpert, NALP Director of Public Service Initiatives

Photo: Harris and Ewing Collection, Library of Congress

Hi Interested Public,

It’s been a long week. I’ve highlighted a few urgent stories with my “Editor’s Choices” but there’s simply too many major items for that section to contain. In addition: the “Federal Shutdown” area contains some of our first glimpses of the Trump administration’s approach to government spending during the shutdown; some employees are continuing to draw paychecks (“We got the people that we want paid — paid,” Trump said”). “Non-Federal Government Issues” includes some interesting responses to our extraordinary circumstances from local governments: a proposed tax increase from the Mayor of Chicago and a newly-declared State of Emergency in Los Angeles County which will provide legal aid funding for affected residents. And “Civil Society” includes a story on planned efforts to retool the IRS to “Enable Pursuit of Left-Leaning Groups.” As always, these stories and more are in the links below.

Solidarity,

Sam

Editor’s Choice(s)

Federal Restructuring

Federal Shutdown

  • ‘Budgetary Twister:’ Trump administration pushes limits to pay federal law enforcement amid shutdown (Federal News Network; 16 Oct 2025)

    “The Defense Department started the trend this week by repurposing $6.5 billion in unspent research and development funds to keep active-duty service members from missing a paycheck on Wednesday. Military personnel have never missed a paycheck during a government shutdown. In another unusual step, FBI Director Kash Patel told reporters at the White House on Wednesday that the Trump administration has taken steps to ensure that the bureau’s special agents will be paid during the shutdown…Patel didn’t specify what funding the FBI would use to keep paying its special agents, and the FBI didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment…Meanwhile, attorneys at the Justice Department are continuing to represent the Trump administration in court, even though they are working through the shutdown without pay.”

  • Trump to pay Ice and border agents amid shutdown as other federal workers go unpaid (The Guardian; 17 Oct 2025)

    “The Trump administration has promised tens of thousands of federal agents carrying out his immigration crackdown that they will be paid during the government shutdown, according to emails seen by Reuters, even as other federal workers go without pay…After the story was reported, Kristi Noem, the homeland security secretary, said in a statement that more than 70,000 law enforcement officers across DHS including those at CBP, Ice, the Secret Service and the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) will be paid. They are to receive by 22 October a “supercheck” covering pay for all hours worked during the shutdown period and the next pay period, she said.”

  • Lawmakers demand White House ensure back pay for furloughed employees (Federal News Network; 16 Oct 2025)

    “In a letter to the Office of Management and Budget, House and Senate lawmakers wrote that the law is clear: Furloughed employees are owed back pay, just as excepted employees are. The letter comes after OMB questioned whether the law actually guaranteed pay for furloughed feds. OMB’s legal opinion, though, quickly received backlash from lawmakers, unions and other employee organizations.”

Non-Federal Governmental Issues

Civil Society

Student Debt & Other Student Concerns

Conflicts Over Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility

Access to Justice

Comments off